Search Results for "Victim detention"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping Case Based on Recovery of Abductee and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Under Sections 364A/368 IPC Confirmed as Testimony of Child Victim and Recovery of Clothes and Toys Corroborate Prosecution Case.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which dismissed the criminal appeals of Harjindra Singh and Dilbag Singh @ Mitthu, uphol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.

The petitioner, Ashok Sahadev Patil, filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in connection with C.R.No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Acid Attack Case Under Section 326(A) IPC — Petitioner in Custody Since December 2019, Trial Not Commenced. Right to Speedy Trial Invoked as Continued Detention Without Trial Progress Violates Article 21.

The petitioner, Kumara Nayaka, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime No.423...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Double Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Buvaji Sahadeo Hajare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara for the murder of Pandurang Vithoba Hirave and Manubai Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention by Police Officers. False Case Under Bombay Police Act Resulted in Discharge, but Court Found No Malafide Intent or Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Miss Veena Sippy, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, alleging...