Search Results for "VAT assessment"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in VAT Dispute — Purchase Price Under GVAT Act Does Not Include VAT Component. Value Added Tax and unclaimed tax credit purchases excluded from taxable turnover of purchases for reduction of tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which affirmed the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. The dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Adverse Remarks and Costs Against Tax Officer in UP VAT Act Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's Findings on Ex Parte Assessment and Service of Notice Upheld, but Ancillary Strictures and Penalties Set Aside for Lack of Hearing Opportunity.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by a tax officer challenging adverse observations, remarks, and costs imposed by the High Court of Judicature at A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of VAT Assessment Orders. High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petitions Under Article 226 When Alternative Statutory Remedy of Appeal Was Available to Assessees Under Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act.

The dispute arose from VAT assessment proceedings where the Assessing Officer passed assessment orders for various years against registered dealers. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Mushroom Farming Income Held Agricultural. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in mushroom farming, filed its income tax return for assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Assessment of VAT Refund Claims for Three Proprietary Concerns Under Section 48(6) of MVAT Act, 2002. Court Orders Finalization of Assessment for 2007-08 Within Three Months to Enable Set Off or Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit.

The petitioners, three proprietary concerns, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench seeking a direction to the respondents ...