Search Results for "Urban Ceiling Act"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.

The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Refund of Premium Paid Under Urban Land Ceiling Act – Estoppel and Waiver of Rights. Court Rejects Money Claim for Refund of Premium After Land Sale, Upholds State’s Policy Under Urban Land Ceiling Act

Estoppel and Waiver: A party that accepts the benefits of a Government Resolution and acts upon it cannot later claim a refund or challenge the legali...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Monetary Demand for Breach of Exemption Conditions Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. The Court Held That the Act Does Not Empower Authorities to Levy Demand as Arrears of Land Revenue; Only Withdrawal of Exemption or Declaration of Land as Excess Is Permissible.

The appellant, Shridhar C. Shetty (deceased through legal representatives), was granted exemption under Sections 20 and 21 of the Urban Land (Ceiling ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal — Possession Not Taken, Land Vests Back in Petitioners. Repeal Act of 1999 Applies as Possession Was Not Taken Under Section 10(5) of the 1976 Act Before Repeal.

The petitioners, Gopalrao Shiva Ikhankar and others, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.

The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Date. Land declared surplus under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 but not taken into possession before repeal on 29.11.2007 stands excluded from the Act.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) challenging the continued application of the Urb...