Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Security Deposit Refund. Cheques Issued for Refund of Security Deposit Under Lease Agreement Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt; Compensation Enhanced to Full Deposit Amount.

The case arises from a lease-cum-rent agreement dated 12th May 2014 between the appellant-accused (landlord) and the respondent-complainant (tenant) f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest established by contemporaneous correspondence; limitation does not bar refund of illegal exaction.

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest does not attract limitation and refund cannot be denied on unjust enrichment when payment was made under compulsion.

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Return of Security Deposit in Tender Dispute - Bank Cannot Forfeit Deposit Without Express Contractual Term. Petitioner withdrew offer before acceptance; no concluded contract; Bank directed to refund Rs.25,00,000/- with interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bholenath Trading Company, a partnership firm, submitted a tender in response to a tender notice dated 9.10.2004 issued by the re...