INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "Trade finance loan"
224 result(s) found
Found 224 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Contract for Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products Held to be Sale, Not Works Contract Under Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the agreement between the assessee and the manufacturer was a contract for sale of goods, as property passed only on delivery and the agreement was on a principal-to-principal basis.
12 Mar 2010The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held t...
- 87
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.
15 Apr 2026The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...
- 1069
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Appeal Against BFAR Ruling on DDT Rate Under India-UK DTAA. Appellant Seeks Restriction of Dividend Distribution Tax to 10% Tax Treaty Rate on Dividends Paid to UK Parent Company.
28 Nov 2025The appellant, M/s. Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd., an Indian company and wholly owned subsidiary of Colorcon Limited, United Kingdom, filed an appeal under ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.
2 Jul 2026The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...
- 270
High Court
Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.
24 Oct 2016The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 36% to 24% per annum. Court holds that 36% per annum interest on delayed payments is penal and excessive, and reduces it to 24% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2015The petitioners, Ashwin Crane & Construction and Ashwin Virji Dhame, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits and Finally Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circulars on Gold Import. Court Hears Arguments on Validity of Circulars Issued Under FEMA and Related Trade Policy.
23 Dec 2015The petitioners, a bullion dealing company and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash RBI Circula...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.
17 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...
- 364
