Search Results for "Trade Marks Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Trade Marks Act"

308 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

5 Apr 2024

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting criminal prosecution under Sections 420, 34 IPC and Sections 27, 28, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court, at its Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

2 Mar 2016

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.

2 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., and the Defendant, Lokranjan Breweries Pvt. Ltd., both manufacture and sell country liquor. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

9 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

13 Jan 2014

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case. 'ULTRATUFF' Held Deceptively Similar to 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

18 Nov 2011

The respondent-plaintiff, Ultratech Cement Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the appellants-defendants, Alaknan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Accept Opposition to Trademark Registration Due to Delay. Section 21 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prescribes Mandatory Limitation Period of Three Months Plus One Month Extension, and Registrar Has No Power to Entertain Opposition Filed Beyond That Period.

27 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi, trading as Volga Confectionary Works, sought to oppose the registration of the trademark 'Volga Ice Cream' ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)