Search Results for "Temporary Workmen"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Temporary Workmen"

436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

26 Oct 2016

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Found Illegal Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Full Back Wages Granted as Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions Renders Retrenchment Void.

2 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by workmen against Kirloskar Ebara Pumps Ltd. challenging the Labour Court's award dated 30th April ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Principal Employer Under Employees Compensation Act, Upholding Joint and Several Liability for Death of Contract Worker. Court Applies Section 12 of Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to Hold Principal Employer KPTCL Liable Along with Contractor, Emphasizing Statutory Protection to Workmen.

30 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from the death of Udachappa, a coolie engaged by Larsen and Toubro Limited (respondent No.3), who was electrocuted on 05.05.2004 whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

29 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Applicability of Model Standing Order 4-C in Letters Patent Appeal. The Single Judge Had Held That Model Standing Order 4-C Does Not Automatically Apply to Establishments with Certified Standing Orders Lacking Similar Provision, Relying on May & Baker Ltd. v. Kishore Jaikishandas Icchaporia.

8 Feb 2005

The dispute arose from the termination of Shri Gangadhar Balgopal Nair, a temporary unskilled workman employed by Voltas Limited, a factory at Thane e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprentice Employees in Zilla Parishad — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of apprentices without inquiry or notice held illegal as they were 'workmen' under the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by 21 individuals who were engaged as apprentices by the Zilla Parishad, Wardha, under the Appre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer’s Writ Petition Against Industrial Court’s Direction to Absorb Employees as Canal Inspectors – Findings of Unfair Labour Practice under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Upheld. Direction to absorb employees on the post of Canal Inspector from the date of complaint was based on evidence that employees had completed training, passed departmental examination, and were actually performing duties of the higher post, with employer failing to act despite available vacancies.

9 Jan 2006

The writ petition was filed by the State Government and its officers challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which had declared that the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Grant of Permanency to Intermittent Workers — Continuous Service Inferred Despite Breaks Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that workmen who worked intermittently with breaks of 12 months to 3 years had continuous service, rejecting the employer's petition.

6 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kinetic Engineering Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Industrial Court that allowed ULP complaints filed by the respondents (Barku...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Daily Wager Not Entitled to Reinstatement for Failure to Complete 240 Days Service. The court held that the workman did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the 12 months preceding retrenchment, and thus the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with backwages was perverse and unsustainable.

7 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged the award of the First Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No.36 of 1990, which directed reinst...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)