Search Results for "Tardeo"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Section 32B of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. Parties Married in 1989 Separated Since 2003 and Agreed to Dissolve Marriage.

The present suit was filed by Mrs. Farzin Kurush Patel (Plaintiff No.1) and Mr. Kurush Jimmy Patel (Plaintiff No.2) in the Parsi Chief Matrimonial Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Appeals Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit Over Film Song; Directs Strict Compliance of Registration Procedures by Original Side Registry

The appeal arose from an ad-interim injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff in a copyright infringement suit concerning the song 'Kah Doon Tumhe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Monitoring Committee's Order in Mukesh Mills Redevelopment Case — CRZ-II Zoning and Development Control Regulations Apply to Textile Mill Land.

The petitioners, M/s TCI Industries Ltd and its Executive Director, owned a large property in Colaba, Mumbai, known as Mukesh Mills, a former cotton t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Watch Manufacturer Against Seizure Under Packaged Commodities Rules. Watches Sold in Boxes Are Not Pre-Packaged Commodities Under Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules 1977.

The petitioner, Titan Industries Ltd., a manufacturer and seller of watches, challenged the seizure of its watches by the respondents (Union of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...