Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1731 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1731 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Court's Power to Extend Time for Deposit in Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay. Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 vests jurisdiction in the court executing the decree to extend time and reject rescission where decree-holder was ready and willing.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18.05.2005. The trial court decreed the suit in part, directing ref...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC Due to Lack of Strong Evidence. Court Holds That Mere Witness Deposition Reiterating Police Statements Is Insufficient to Summon Accused Who Were Previously Discharged After Investigation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rajesh and others against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which had confirmed the Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Petition for Extension of Bank Guarantee Pending Challenge to Arbitral Award — Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Post-award interim protection can be granted under Section 9 to preserve the subject matter of arbitration pending challenge to award.

The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...