Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

1124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Sale Agreement. Recital of Possession in Agreement Not Conclusive When Only 15% Consideration Paid; Refund Admissible Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 19 March 2020, by which the petitioners agreed to purchase a flat in Karad, Satara for a total cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Unstamped Agreement to Sell Does Not Justify Rejection Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Court Holds That Question of Stamp Duty Is a Preliminary Issue Under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC, Not a Ground for Rejection of Plaint.

11 Apr 2022

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a Special Civil Suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.08.2011. The respondent/def...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Impounding Order Under Karnataka Stamp Act for Non-Compliance with Section 33 Procedure. Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Levied Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

17 Feb 2021

The petitioner, who was the second defendant in an eviction suit (O.S.No.5192/2011) pending before the III Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Stamp Vendor-Postman Challenging Reduction in Pay for Misappropriation of Rs.330/-. Disciplinary action upheld as punishment was not disproportionate and findings were based on evidence.

31 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Shailendra Sahedeo Mondkar, was a stamp vendor-postman in the office of Bharat Chamber Post Office, Kalbadevi, Mumbai. He was selected...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment in Development Agreement Case — Revenue Sharing Arrangement Not Constituting Conveyance. Interest-free refundable deposit and revenue sharing in development agreement held not to be consideration for transfer of property under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Godrej Properties Ltd. (GP), entered into a development agreement with Goldbricks Infrastructure Private Ltd. (GIPL) on 30.09.2011 for...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

30 Apr 2015

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment Due to Unstamped Lease Deed. Insufficiently Stamped Document Cannot Be Acted Upon Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Sub-Lease of Multiplex — Lease Premium Not Part of Consideration for Sub-Lease Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that the expression 'consideration for the sub-lease' in Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 refers only to the consideration moving from the sub-lessee to the sub-lessor, and not the premium paid by the original lessee to the lessor.

9 Jul 2014

The petitioner, CR Retail Malls (India) Limited, challenged an order dated 21 March 2013 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Stamp Duty and Registration Charges in Anticipation of Registration of Sale Deed That Did Not Materialize. Limitation under Section 49 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 runs from date of presentation of instrument, not from date of payment.

29 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Sri Gopalrao Tukaram Kukdolkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 44(1)(i) of Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 as Ultra Vires Registration Act, 1908. Circular requiring NOC from Gram Panchayat for registration of sale deeds quashed for lack of statutory authority.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)