Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "Small Causes Court jurisdiction"
736 result(s) found
Found 736 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Against Tenant in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice of Demand Must Be Express Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord's Failure to Demand Rent in Notice and Tenant's Regular Deposit of Rent in Court Precludes Eviction on Ground of Default.
21 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between the original plaintiffs (landlords) and the defendant (tenant) over eviction from a shop premises. The landlords f...
- 550
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.
30 Apr 2019The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case Under Bombay Rent Act for Encroachment and Change of User. Concurrent findings of fact on grounds under Section 13(1)(c) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1974 upheld.
28 Nov 2017The petitioner, Laxmibai Ganpati Bhingare, was the tenant of an open plot admeasuring 30 sq.ft x 20 sq.ft in Sangli, owned by the respondent, Shivaji ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Dispute — Lease Not Renewed After Expiry, Tenancy Not Protected Under Rent Act. The court held that a lessee continuing in possession after lease expiry without renewal is not a tenant under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and is liable to vacate.
23 Apr 2015The case involves a civil revision application challenging concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appeal Bench. The prop...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partnership Dispute, Upholds Small Causes Court Jurisdiction. Fixed monthly payment of Rs.1,500/- to one partner held permissible under partnership deed, and oral evidence inconsistent with written terms cannot be considered.
4 Apr 2014The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Ad-hoc District Judge-2, Nagpur, dismissin...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.
10 May 2013The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging City Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Open Land. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, Prevails Over Rent Control Act Applicability.
6 Jun 2006The dispute originated from a declaratory suit filed by the First Respondent (tenant) against the Petitioner (landlord) in the Court of Small Causes a...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Second Appeal in Eviction Suit for Bonafide Need of Landlords. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Bonafide Requirement Cannot Be Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC.
16 Dec 2005The appellant, Vijay Shrihari Khandar, was a tenant in a part of a house bearing No.31 C.T.S. 2035, Sheet No.8 at Ramtek, owned by the respondents, Sh...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Strike Out Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. Court held that disputed questions of title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC and require full trial.
30 Nov -0001The judgment arises from two civil revision applications filed against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 30th April 2014, which dismisse...
- 212
