Search Results for "Sentence Modification"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bail Cancellation Case Due to Non-compliance with Financial Undertaking. High Court's order cancelling bail upheld as appellant failed to pay full compensation amount of Rs.4,63,50,000 as per settlement under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case originated from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, where the appellant and intervenor, as Chairman and Vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case, Modifies Sentence to Fine. Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Favours Complainant Unless Rebutted by Probable Defence – High Court’s Acquittal Overturned

Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt (Sections 118 & 139 NI Act): The Supreme Court reiterated that once the complainant proves the cheque...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Designation Process for Senior Advocates in Jitender @ Kalla Case. The Court examines the validity and procedure of designating Senior Advocates under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961, and modifies guidelines to ensure uniformity and transparency.

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed concerns regarding the process of designation of Senior Advocates under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...