Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"

1399 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1399 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Financial Creditor in Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Approval of Resolution Plan by Committee of Creditors Based on Commercial Wisdom is Not Subject to Judicial Review on Grounds of Security Interest Value Omission, as Per Section 30(4) and Limited Scope Under Section 61(3).

13 May 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the corporate debtor VSP Udyog Private Limited. The appellan...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Dissenting Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case on Interpretation of Amended Section 30(2)(b)(ii) - Court Holds Amendments Apply to Pending Proceedings and Entitle Creditor to Liquidation Value of Security Interest Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

3 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from appeals concerning the interpretation of amended Section 30(2)(b)(ii) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petitions Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Term Loan Defaults. Financial Corporation Entitled to Enforcement of Security Interest Without Prior Adjudication of Liability.

25 Apr 2005

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a deemed State Financial Corporation under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a group of pe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal and Release of Deposited Amount in Insolvency Case — Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Bars Enforcement Against Corporate Debtor's Assets. The cash deposit made by the corporate debtor in court is an asset belonging to the corporate debtor, and the resolution professional is entitled to its release for the resolution process.

13 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed an application filed by the Resolution Professional of Siti Networks Ltd. (corporate debtor) seeking withdrawal of Appea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Revision and Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34. Jurisdiction of Civil Court is Ousted When Secured Creditor Takes Action Under SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest.

11 Feb 2011

The case involves a civil suit filed by Sagar and Saurabh Deshmukh (original plaintiffs) against their father Pramod Deshmukh, mother Vrunda Deshmukh,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Section 14 Order and Auction Under SARFAESI Act, 2002; Petitioner Alleges Violation of Natural Justice. The Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Given Available Alternate Remedy Under Section 17.

9 Nov 2021

The petitioner, a sole proprietor of a knitwear unit, had availed term loan and cash credit facilities aggregating Rs. 4.55 crores from respondent no....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)