Search Results for "Section 48(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 48(3)"

430 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 430 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Town Municipality in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Held Within Limitation. Court upholds reference filed under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as within time, rejecting appellant's limitation plea based on lack of evidence of valid award notice.

18 Apr 2024

The Town Municipal Council, Holenarasipur, the beneficiary of land acquisition, appealed against the judgment and award dated 30.01.2020 passed by the...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging State Transport Department's Order. Petitioners Assail Government Decision Dated 05.08.2015 on Grounds of Illegality Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules.

3 May 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal for Impleadment in Winding Up Proceedings Due to Lack of Shareholding and Delay. Appellant, who sold his shares and ceased to be a shareholder, cannot seek impleadment in company winding up proceedings under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

25 Feb 2015

The appellant, Dr. Kirtivan D. Kotian, along with his family members, originally held over 95% shares of M/s S. Manikya Plastichem Private Limited and...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)