Search Results for "Section 395 IPC"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as sole identification by injured witness was not credible and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an incident of dacoity that occurred on 3 November 2008 when Madhukar Palankar, the father of the informant Shailesh Palankar, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Dacoity and Impersonation. Identification of Accused Through Test Identification Parades and Recoveries of Stolen Property Scrutinized Under Sections 395, 397, 170, 342 IPC.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard five criminal appeals filed by seven appellants against their conviction and sentence imposed by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Criminal Appeals Concerning Dacoity Conviction Under IPC 395, 397 and Arms Act; Outcome Undetermined Due to Incomplete Text. The Court Analyzed Evidence on Identification, Recovery, and Acquittal Appeals but Final Decision Not Provided.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals arising from the same judgment and order dated 10th April 2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Dacoity with Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Conviction Under Sections 396, 457, and 380 IPC Confirmed as Recovery of Stolen Ornaments Soon After Incident Establishes Guilt.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Noora, Gorakh, and Navnath against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Process in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Vague Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Particulars of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Cannot Sustain Proceedings Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners, who are relatives of the husband of respondent no.2, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Gross Negligence. Death During Surgery Not Sufficient for Criminal Liability Under Section 304A IPC Without Proof of Recklessness.

The case arises from the death of Prakash Parekh, a young man who underwent a surgical procedure performed by Dr. Anil Pinto on 20/02/1984. The compla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...