Search Results for "Section 366 IPC"

218 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove age and penetration beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naresh @ Lalo Rayaji Rathod, was convicted by the Special & Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case No. 56/2015 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Appellant No.2's conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC confirmed based on consistent testimony of prosecutrix and medical evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rudresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chitradurga in S.C.No.23/2011 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Private Defence Claim — Evidence of Intentional Fatal Stabbing on Vital Part Establishes Offence Under Section 302 IPC. Right of Private Defence Not Available Where Accused Was Aggressor and Attack Was Not in Good Faith.

The case involves an appeal by R. Jayapal against his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Poondhaisezhiyan. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Unproven Age and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Credible Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by Subhash Bharsakle and his mother Leelabai against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence in Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl - Accused's Appeal Dismissed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and medical evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 364, 366, 376, 377, 302, 201 IPC.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, and murder of an 11-year-old girl named Bhagyashree on 10.11.2004. The accused, Arjun Laxman Jogadiya alias...