Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

968 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Criminal Complaint for Alleged Offences Under IPC. Court holds that mere filing of civil suit and criminal complaint does not warrant initiation of proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without prima facie satisfaction of offence.

16 Jul 2026

The appellant, Arun Kumar Sharma, filed a criminal appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and orde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

2 Sep 2020

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IA(4). Tribunal's finding that assessee qualified as developer of infrastructure facilities for Srisailam and Koyna projects was upheld, as assessee undertook development work and transferred facility to government, meeting statutory criteria under Income-Tax Act, 1961.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

20 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)