Search Results for "Section 337"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reduces Applicant's Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Exonerated of Stalking Charges. Accused receives 36-day imprisonment for rash and negligent driving but cleared of stalking charges under IPC Section 354D.

The Bombay High Court revised the sentencing in a criminal revision application. Applicant was initially convicted for offenses under Sections 279, 35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Excise License Transfer Dispute — Partnership Dispute Requires Civil Court Adjudication. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Order Quashed as Excise Authorities Cannot Summarily Reject Transfer Application Without Adjudicating Partnership Dispute.

The petitioner and respondent were partners in the firm M/s. Marthanda Enterprises, constituted under a Partnership Deed dated 15.12.2010. The firm ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows NIA Appeal Under Section 21(1) of NIA Act, 2008 Against Rejection of Tender of Pardon Under Section 306 CrPC — Held That Order Rejecting Pardon Application Is Not Interlocutory and Is Appealable.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed an appeal under Section 21(1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identity. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A, 337 IPC and Sections 78, 112 Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove accused was the driver of the offending vehicle.

The petitioner, Vithal Mahadu Ravate, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kirkee, Pune, on 7 February 1992 for offences under Sectio...