Search Results for "Section 329 CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 329 CrPC"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Corruption Case Due to Expiry of 60-Day Detention Without Charge Sheet. Interpretation of 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' Under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Clarified; Bail Right Accrues on Expiry of Maximum Detention Period, Not Defeated by Later Filing of Charge Sheet.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed the right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case arising from a corruptio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Occupier in Factory Fatality Case, Quashes Criminal Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability. Occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited not vicariously liable under Sections 92, 94, 101 of Factories Act, 1948 as complaint lacked specific allegations of negligence or knowledge regarding fatal accident of worker Rajendra Dewade.

15 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ram Bharat, occupier of Patanjali Foods Limited, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in Rape Case Due to Consensual Long-Term Relationship. Consent Not Vitiated by Misconception When Engagement Evidenced Intent to Marry; Ingredients of Sections 375, 376 and 417 IPC Not Satisfied.

5 Nov 2024

This criminal petition was filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.140/2023 and t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

30 Aug 2024

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Citing Improbable Allegations. The Court Found that the Rape Allegation on the Day of Engagement Was Implausible and the Cheating Charges Were Not Maintainable in the Absence of Deception from Inception, in proceedings under Sections 376, 420, 417, 109, 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

7 Jun 2024

The High Court of Karnataka allowed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash proceedings in C.C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused for Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC Due to Lack of Instigation. Statement 'Go Hang Yourself' by Husband Upon Discovering Wife's Affair with Deceased Priest Held Not to Constitute Abetment Without Proximate Live Link to Suicide.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, David D’Souza, sought quashing of criminal proceedings pending against him for abetment to suicide following the death of Father Mah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summoning Order Under Section 319 CrPC for Applicant Named in FIR but Excluded from Charge Sheet Based on Alibi Evidence. The court held that the trial court erred in summoning the applicant when the investigating officer had already accepted his alibi and did not file a supplementary charge sheet under Section 173(8) CrPC.

23 Jan 2023

The applicant, Anand Shivaji Ghodale, was named in an FIR but not arraigned as an accused in the charge sheet. The investigating officer, after collec...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Section 41-A Notice Issued in Uttar Pradesh Fake News FIR; Twitter India Employee Contends No Control Over Platform and No Cause of Action in Karnataka.

23 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Limited (TCIPL), holding the designation of Managing Director b...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.

14 Oct 2005

The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)