Search Results for "Section 24(2) lapse"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Right of Way Order Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act Due to Bar of Res Judicata and Lack of Jurisdiction. Dismissal of First Application for Default Operates as Final Order Barring Second Application Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.

The petitioner, Jayant Namdeorao Gohad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...