Search Results for "Section 16(2) jurisdiction challenge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 16(2) jurisdiction challenge"

502 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

4 May 2023

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...

High Court

KAHC010102062008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

KAHC010480352008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears writ petitions and appeals challenging the Government Order dated 12 August 2008 that handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Devaru Temple, Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. The court examines the legality of the order under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, relevant endowments laws, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

21 Nov 2017

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)