Search Results for "Saurashtra Rules"

116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.

The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...