Search Results for "SEBI consent"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Winding Up Petition Based on Alleged Debt Arising Out of F&O Trades; Respondent Disputes Liability and Raises Counter-Claim for Damages

This company petition sought winding up of Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd under the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of inability to pay debts. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Asset Management Company Tax Case — Notional Addition Based on SEBI Ceiling Not Permissible. Investment advisory fees actually charged, not the maximum permissible under SEBI regulations, constitute taxable income.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the CIT (A)'s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Transferor and Transferee Companies Despite Intervenor Objection. Non-Disclosure of Pre and Post Capital Structure in Explanatory Statement Did Not Invalidate Scheme When Shareholders Had Sufficient Information Under Section 393 of Companies Act, 1956.

The transferor company, Chemidye Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd., both engaged in similar chemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...