Search Results for "Rule 986"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Work Order in Public Tender Dispute Due to Arbitrary Evaluation and Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. Court holds that the respondent authority's failure to adhere to the stipulated tender conditions and its arbitrary evaluation of bids vitiates the award of the work order.

The petitioner, M/s. Hitech Audio Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a work order issued by the 2nd respondent, the Chief Engineer (Electrical) of the Publ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Certificate Under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 Despite Delay in Payment of Tax. Petitioner's failure to pay tax within prescribed time due to financial constraints was condoned as the scheme was beneficial and the delay was not contumacious.

The petitioner, Kamla Chandrasingh Kabali, a spinster, could not file income tax returns for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 due to unfavourable f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares LIC Owner of Suit Property, Orders Removal of Unauthorized Construction by Defendants. Defendants' claim based on revenue stay order and adverse possession fails as LIC's title from 1948 conveyance and statutory vesting under Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 is established.

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership, removal of construction, and possession of land in Eksar,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010645132024_1

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

43994

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 06.10.2007, which upheld convictions and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...