Search Results for "Representative appointment"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registrar Appointment Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, a Senate Member and Associate Professor, Failed to Apply for the Post and Thus Cannot Challenge the Selection Process Under Article 226.

The Petitioner, Dr. Harsh Kashinathrao Gaikwad, an Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Chemistry at a college affiliated with Savitribai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim Despite Deletion from Waiting List Due to Government Resolution — Petitioner's Name Directed to Be Restored in Waiting List for Zilla Parishad Post. Substitution of Name Prior to Government Resolution Valid, Deletion Unjustified.

The petitioner, Payal Puran Patle, filed a writ petition seeking restoration of her name in the waiting list for compassionate appointment after it wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...