Search Results for "Rent Controller powers"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Reference on Difference of Opinion in Municipal Tax Assessment Case. Question of law regarding determination of annual letting value under Section 154 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for premises exempt under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

This judgment is a reference to a third judge following a difference of opinion in an appeal against a Single Judge's decision in a writ petition conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by RTO Agents' Association Challenging Eviction Order Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. Eviction and Arrears of Rent Upheld as Competent Authority's Orders Were Not Successfully Challenged.

The petitioner, The Association of Recognized Agents, is a registered association of RTO agents who were allotted a room in the RTO Compound at Tulsiw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of De-requisition and Possession Handover Under Bombay Land Requisition Act. State Held Obligated to Deliver Possession of De-requisitioned Premises to Landlord, Not Unauthorised Third Party, Under Sections 9(1) and 9(3) of the Act.

The writ petition arose from a dispute regarding Room No. 26, Chhotani Building, Lower Parel, Mumbai. The petitioner was the landlord of the building....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether State Rent Control Act Is Ultra Vires in Cantonment Areas Due to Union's Exclusive Competence under Entry 3 of List I. The Case Involves Interpretation of 'Regulation of House Accommodation' in the Context of Legislative Powers over Cantonments.

The case arose from a suit for eviction filed by Rama Sundari Devi, the owner of premises situated within the cantonment area of Barrackpore, against ...