Search Results for "Re-examination"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Challenged Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC. Evidence of Victim's Mental Condition and Consistent Testimony of Witnesses Sufficient to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse.

The appellant, Raju Jaishriram Telgote, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Sessions Case No. 64/2015 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will Allegedly Obtained by Fraud and Undue Influence — Will Not Proved as Genuine Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Examine Attesting Witnesses.

The case pertains to a petition for Letters of Administration with the Will of Mangesh Pandurang Rege dated 1st October 1971. The original petitioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Will Execution. Plaintiff failed to examine attesting witnesses or produce evidence to prove due execution of Will under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Romeo Anacleto D'Souza, filed a testamentary petition seeking probate of the Will dated 26th May 1986 of his mother, Mrs Ermina Pinto D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nafis Taufiq Shaikh, was convicted by the 5th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his step-mother Parveen and half...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...