Search Results for "Re-determination"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Beneficial Interpretation to Uphold Rights of Marginalized Landowners in Land Acquisition Cases.

The Supreme Court reiterated that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act must be interpreted as a beneficial provision to remove inequality in compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Claimants denied compensation for fruit bearing trees due to lack of evidence.

The appellants, original claimants, owned agricultural land in village Wadaji, Osmanabad, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a medium ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Redetermination of Compensation Under National Highways Act — Limitation Period for Section 3G(5) Application Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award, Not from Notice Under Section 3H.

The petitioners, Bajranglal Vyankatlal Malu and Lalchand Vyankatlal Malu, were owners of lands acquired for the construction of National Highway No.7....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Application. Petitioner's ignorance of appeal decision held sufficient cause for delay under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Parasmal Jain, was a landowner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Upper Wainganga Project. An award under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Third Member Reference and Remand Ambiguity. The court held that the third member cannot go beyond the referred question and the remand order was ambiguous, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-...