Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape and Atrocities Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Upheld.

The appellant, Ramdas alias Ramkisan s/o Nagnath Hulgunde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rape Based on Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix — Delay in FIR and Absence of Injuries Not Fatal. The court held that the prosecutrix's evidence was credible and trustworthy, and no corroboration was required under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Phool Singh, was convicted by the trial court for the offence of rape under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to seven years rigorous impri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman Janu Kokare, was convicted under Section 376(f) of the Indian Penal Code for the aggravated rape of a 9-year-old girl on 9 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Child Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. Seven-Year-Old Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Dilip Bharat Gavand @ Kanwa, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(f) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandeep Janaji Konde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Head Constable for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Evidence of Victim and Medical Reports Proved Rape Without Consent and Victim's Age Below 16 Years Made Consent Irrelevant Under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a) and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of a head constable for kidnapping and raping a minor girl. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shri Monappa Parava, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi District, Udupi in S.C. No. 16/2016 for offences punishable u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Watchman for Rape of 8-Year-Old Student Under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC. Evidence of Child Victim and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raghuvir Dessai, was a watchman at a government school in Goa. On 6 August 2003, at about 1:30 PM, he wrongfully confined an 8-year-old...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...