Search Results for "RPAD returned"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "RPAD returned"

50 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Despite Vehicle Seizure Claim. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 NI Act Stands as Liability Not Extinguished by Seizure of Collateral.

18 Mar 2026

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shobhnaben Jayendrakumar Panchal against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Panchmahal ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Auto-Rickshaw Driver in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Lorry Driver Established, Future Prospects Considered. The Court set aside the finding of contributory negligence and enhanced compensation from Rs.3,68,000 to Rs.6,13,840 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Dec 2022

The appellant, Srikanta M.R., a 34-year-old auto-rickshaw driver, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in NI Act Case — Permits Complainant to Lead Further Evidence and Mark Xerox Copy of Postal Acknowledgment. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing applications under Section 311 CrPC and Section 63 Evidence Act, as the postal acknowledgment was crucial to prove service of legal notice under Section 138 NI Act.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner-complainant, Sri S Sudarshan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Motor Accident Claims Appeals Against Awards of Additional MACT, Kumta. Claimants Seek Enhancement of Compensation and Insurers Challenge Liability in Multiple Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cases.

28 Mar 2019

The matter involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 31.12.2011 pass...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant's Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Dismissed Due to Non-Prosecution. Court Restores Complaint on Condition of Costs, Holding That Dismissal for Default Is Not an Acquittal and Can Be Revived in the Interest of Justice.

14 Dec 2018

The complainant, Smt. H. Gayathri, filed a criminal revision petition before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench, challenging the judgment an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Proximity and Absence of Cruelty Soon Before Death. The court held that the ingredients of Section 304B IPC and Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act were not satisfied as the alleged cruelty was not shown to be 'soon before death' and the relatives residing separately had no proximity to the deceased.

21 Aug 2017

The applicants, who are the husband (Pravin Ramdas Patil), his parents (Ramdas and Vanita), brother (Amit), married sister (Priyanka), and brother-in-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company Liability in Motor Accident Claim Despite Dishonoured Cheque — Insurer Must Pay Third Party Compensation and Recover from Insured. The court held that under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to a third party even if the policy was cancelled due to dishonour of premium cheque, as the cancellation was not communicated to the third party.

26 Jul 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the appellant, National Insurance Company Ltd., challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt and Notice Was Not Properly Served.

25 Apr 2014

The revision petition was filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

17 Dec 2012

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Complaint Against Former Technical Advisor in Cheque Dishonour Case. Petitioner Not a Director or Incharge of Company Affairs at Time of Cheque Issuance, Hence Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138/141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

16 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M.M. Pangarkar, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of complaint S...

3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)