Search Results for "Punjab Civil Services Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Punjab Civil Services Rules"

1192 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1192 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

1 Jan 1970

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Rajasthan Judicial Service Appointment Case Over Validity of Reserved Category Certificates. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that a subsequent notice imposing a deadline for certificate issuance was not arbitrary, as reserved category status is dynamic and requires valid certificates at the time of application under the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010.

8 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from the appointment process for Civil Judges in Rajasthan under the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010. The Rajasthan High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Government Employees — Rule of Promulgation and Publication of Statutory Rules Upheld. Reduction of retirement age from 60 to 58 years invalid due to non-publication of amended rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, five retired government employees of the Public Works Department in Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Regularization Dispute Under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, Quashing High Court's Dismissal. Classification Excluding Academic Arrangement Appointees Under Section 3(b) Held Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, Entitling Appellants to Regularization Upon Fulfillment of Statutory Conditions.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the appellants' challenge to their exclusion from regularization benefits under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Exemption from Marathi Shorthand Examination - Petitioner Granted Exemption Under Rule 10 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Compulsory Marathi Shorthand and Marathi Typing Examinations for English Stenographers and English Typists) Rules, 1991. The court quashed the order of the Desk Officer for non-application of mind and directed the State Government to consider the proposal afresh.

1 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Ramkrishna Narayan Ghuge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18th May 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Directing Allocation of IAS Cadre to Kerala - Upholds Union's Allocation Policy and Rules. The Court found that the High Court misread statutory rules and policy on cadre allocation, consultation with State Government, and treatment of OBC candidates qualifying on general merit under the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954, and Civil Services Examination notification.

22 Oct 2021

The appeals arose from an order of the High Court of Kerala directing the Union of India to allocate the respondent, a successful candidate in the Civ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Constable in CISF. Petitioner Contends Discharge Was Stigmatic and Without Enquiry; Respondents Argue It Was Simpliciter Under Rule 25(2) of CISF Rules, 2001.

23 Jul 2013

The petitioner, a Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Discharge for IPC Offences Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC, Upholds Corruption Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Deputation of Public Servant to Municipal Corporation Renders Section 197 CrPC Inapplicable as He Ceases to Be Removable by Government, and Amended Section 19 of PC Act Does Not Apply Retrospectively to Retired Official.

22 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court heard two appeals by special leave against a common judgment and order dated 29 January 2024 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)