Search Results for "Project Affected Families"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition in IOD Requiring Registered Agreement with Tenant for Redevelopment. Condition No.10 in IOD directing that registered agreement with existing tenant not be submitted before CC is set aside as arbitrary and contrary to DCR.

The Petitioner, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired redevelopment rights over land admeasuring approximately 20149.40 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.

The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Family in BWSSB Water Supply Project. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Respondents to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Allotment of Site/House and Rehabilitation Within Eight Weeks.

The petitioner, Smt. Nagamma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Temple Receivership Dispute, Remands for Fresh Consideration. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its contempt jurisdiction by setting aside the Trial Court's order appointing a Seven Member Committee as Receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC.

The appeal arose from a High Court order in a contempt petition that set aside a Trial Court's order appointing a Seven Member Committee as Receiver f...