Search Results for "Pension scheme judicial officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Pension scheme judicial officers"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by BBMP Employees' Association Challenging Recruitment Rule 4(a) — Rule Providing 50% Direct Recruitment and 50% Promotion Held Valid. The court held that Rule 4(a) of the BBMP (General Cadre and Recruitment of Officers and Employees) Rules, 2018 is not ultra vires the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and is within the rule-making power under Section 421 of the Act.

26 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Officer and Employees Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.

10 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Municipal Employee Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Opportunity. Recovery of Rs.25,00,010/- set aside as show cause notice issued eight years after retirement without proper inquiry violates principles of natural justice under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

20 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Samadhan Kisanrao Ingle, was a Tax Superintendent with the Municipal Council, Khamgaon, appointed on 16/04/1968 and retired on 30/06/2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Pensionary Benefits to Employees of Autonomous Society. Denial of Pension Does Not Violate Article 14 as Employees of Society Registered Under Societies Registration Act, 1860 Are Not Similarly Situated to Government Employees Under Specific Service Rules Excluding Pension.

10 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Maharashtra's refusal to extend pensionary benefits to employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Gratuity and Leave Encashment Against OBC Corporation — Employee Entitled to Benefits Despite Non-Adoption of Payment of Gratuity Act. Non-adoption of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 by employer does not disentitle employee to gratuity if establishment is covered under the Act; leave encashment is a contractual right.

7 May 2021

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Nagesh Jagdishrao Deshpande, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Benefit to Development Officer. Court holds that the Scheme's eligibility conditions are clear and the petitioner's application was rightly rejected as he did not meet the qualifying service requirement.

8 Mar 2019

The petitioner, K.G.H. Dodhiya, joined the New India Assurance Company Limited as a Development Officer on 16 April 1977 and later became an Administr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Retired Industrial Court Presiding Officers Seeking Pension Under Judicial Service Rules. Service as Presiding Officer of Industrial Court under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 is not qualifying service for pension under Maharashtra Judicial Service Pension Rules, 1982, as Industrial Court is not part of the judicial service under the High Court.

14 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by retired Presiding Officers of the Industrial Court in Maharashtra, challenging the denial of pensi...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

6 Jan 2017

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)