CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1659 OF 2005
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Party Array"
374 result(s) found
Found 374 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...
- 933
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Property Mutation and Sales Tax Recovery Case — High Court's Direction to Delete Adverse Entries and Mutate Property Set Aside. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its writ jurisdiction by directing mutation without considering the State's statutory charge under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
28 Apr 2023The Supreme Court heard two sets of civil appeals filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh and its officers against a judgment of the Himachal Pradesh H...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.
19 Nov 2013The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...
- 115
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Motions in Suit by Foreign Trustees for Recovery of Assets Allegedly Concealed in India. The Court Examines Whether Plaintiffs Have Made Out Prima Facie Case for Disclosure and Deposit Orders Based on US Bankruptcy Court Findings.
8 Dec 2005The suit was filed by ITC Ltd., acting as trustees in bankruptcy of Suresh Chitalia, Devang Chitalia, EST Fibres Inc., and Lokman Establishment, to re...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband in Section 498A IPC Case Due to Lack of Cruelty Ingredients. Dispute Over Refusal to Give Money for Pooja Does Not Amount to Cruelty Under Section 498A, and Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations of Wilful Conduct Likely to Drive Woman to Suicide or Grave Injury.
5 Sep 2023The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Be...
- 54
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Dismissal of Application to Admit Additional Documents. Court holds that additional documents can be admitted at any stage if relevant for just adjudication, and that Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC permits production of documents not earlier produced with due explanation.
6 Jan 2026The case arises from a partition suit filed by the Plaintiff (Saraswathi) against her brother (first Defendant) and others. The Plaintiff claimed that...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Dismissing ULP Complaints of Bank Employees; Holds Claims for Unpaid Wages Not Barred by Limitation or Section 107 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Recurring Cause of Action Principle Applied to Dearness Allowance Claims; Registrar Directed to Grant Permission Under Section 107.
5 Dec 2016The two writ petitions were filed by employees of Shri P.K. Anna Patil Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd., which had been placed under liquidation. The petition...
- 141
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship Over 10 Years. Long-Standing Relationship Without Complaint Indicates Consent, Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Mahesh Damu Khare against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dismissed his petition under Sect...
- 1406
High Court
Bombay High Court Heard Appeal in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on Joint Liability of Husband for Wife's Share Trading Debit Balance. The court examined whether separate client accounts under Regulation 247A of the Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-laws precluded the broker from claiming joint and several liability against the appellant for the debit balance of his wife's separate trading account absent a tripartite agreement.
29 Apr 2021The dispute arose out of a share trading relationship between a stock broker and two of its constituents, who were husband and wife, each maintaining ...
