Search Results for "Pahani"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Pahani"

68 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of NOC for Mining Activities — Forest Department Cannot Revoke No Objection Certificate Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that withdrawal of NOC without notice and hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Mr. H.K. Lakshman Gowda, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Kar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Held that the Trial Court and First Appellate Court erred in granting share to plaintiffs without proper proof of joint family status and without considering the effect of prior partition and ouster.

23 Mar 2023

The appellant, defendant No.2, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

24 Nov 2021

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

20 Dec 2019

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Agricultural Worker in Motor Accident Claim. Notional income reassessed at Rs.6,000 per month and multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, resulting in enhanced award of Rs.9,34,000.

3 Jun 2019

This appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 5.5.2010 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn), CJM, Tumkur in MVC No.867/2008, whereby the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Tahsildar Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 set aside as petitioners were not heard before eviction.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioners, K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat, residents of Kolluru village and belonging to the Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute Involving Archak Family of Kolluru Mookambika Temple — Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that an order passed without notice to the persons in possession is violative of principles of natural justice and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioners, K N Parameshwara Adiga and Kalidasa Bhat, residents of Kolluru village and belonging to the Archak family of Sri Kolluru Mookambika t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Petitioner Lacks Title and Possessory Rights Over Disputed Property. Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not appropriate for adjudication of disputed questions of title and possession; mutation entries do not confer title.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records — Petitioner Fails to Establish Title or Possession Over Disputed Property. Mutation entries do not confer title; disputed questions of title and possession cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

22 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Walter Stephen Mendes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Suit for Possession of Agricultural Land, Upholds Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. The court held that a suit filed by a trustee with authorization from all trustees is maintainable and that permission of the Charity Commissioner is not necessary for a trustee to file a suit.

19 Dec 2018

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendants against the decree of the first appellate court which reversed the trial court's dismissa...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)