Search Results for "Net Asset Value"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Net Asset Value"

223 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Firm's Ownership Over Property Contributed by Partner in Hotel Partnership Case. Relinquishment Deed and Partnership Act Section 14 Confirm Property as Firm Asset, Not Inheritable by Legal Heirs.

3 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, M/s Hotel Alka Raje, constituted in 1972 by late Bhairo Prasad Jaiswal and his brother Hanuman Prasad Jaisw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Investment in Bonds Prior to Sale of Property Does Not Disentitle Deduction Under Section 54EC. The Court held that the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the reopening was based on a change of opinion, thus invalid.

27 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Mrs. Parveen P. Bharucha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 31.03.2011 i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Tax Exemption and Classification of Lease Transactions in Income Tax Reference concerning Scientific Research Centre. Assessee's claim for exemption under Section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 hinges on whether activities constitute general public utility, whether construction and letting out of World Trade Centre amounts to business, and whether receipts are revenue in nature.

25 Oct 2012

The Income Tax Reference No. 78 of 1998 arose from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's common order dated 29th March, 1996, for assessment years 1989-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to AAR Order on Capital Gains Tax Exemption for Non-Resident Share Transfer. Transfer of shares by non-resident to another non-resident outside India does not attract capital gains tax under Section 9(1)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as the shares are not situated in India.

25 Nov 2016

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 12.03.2010 and 15.06.2010 passed by the Additional Commissione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Organon (India) Limited — Scheme Approved Despite Objection Regarding Valuation and Fairness. Court held that the reduction was fair and reasonable, and the objection regarding valuation was not sustainable as the price was based on SEBI delisting guidelines and accepted by majority shareholders.

7 Jun 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Scheme Petition filed by Organon (India) Limited seeking sanction and confirmation of a special resolution passed by i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

14 Aug 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to SBI Mutual Fund Merger and Directs SEBI Impleadment to Assess Regulatory Compliance. Court Examines Maintainability Under Article 226 and the Validity of Merger Based on Prevailing NAV Without Investor Meeting in Light of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996.

4 Dec 2012

The Petitioner, appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the merger of the SBI One India Fund with...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)