Search Results for "Negotiable Instruments"

1379 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1379 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as no averment of legally enforceable debt or liability exists.

The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings in C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 for Plot Purchase — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Smt. Y. Bangarama, filed a criminal appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 23rd July 2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Debt or Liability Must Be Legally Enforceable on the Date of Cheque Issuance Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M. Shantilal & Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Reduces Fine Amount. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding cheque issued for repayment of loan.

The case arises from a complaint filed by M/s. Meenakshi Developers (respondent/complainant) against Sri V.V. Chari (petitioner/accused) under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Condition of Deposit of 25% Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Cases. Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to pending appeals; condition does not violate Article 21.

The petitioner, Ajay Vinodchandra Shah, was convicted in three separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque bou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Return of Complaints in NI Act Cases Where Stage Under Section 145(2) Not Reached. Filing of Affidavit of Evidence Does Not Conclude Examination-in-Chief Under Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Rajesh Ashok Ranpura, filed four criminal writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplana...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...