Search Results for "Narcotics"

219 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 219 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Delay in Trial. Personal Search of Accused Conducted Without Informing Right to Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Violating Mandatory Safeguard Under Section 50 of NDPS Act.

The applicant, Arshad Karar Khan, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking regular ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case: Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Sustained. Commercial Quantity of Charas Recovered from Appellants; Complainant as Investigating Officer Not Per Se Biased.

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appeal was filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau against the acquittal of the respondent for an offence under Section 21 read with Section 8(c) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) — Conviction for Possession of Charas Set Aside as Search and Seizure Vitiated by Failure to Transmit Information to Immediate Official Superior.

The appellants, Daulatram @Dolly Trilok Singh, Shahmohammed Salatmatmiya Shah, and Bampada @Bamdeo @Ity Sanatan Adak, were convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by NCB in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conspiracy. Control delivery and recovery of narcotics from parcels not sufficient to prove accused's involvement under Sections 29, 22, 23, 28, 8(c) of NDPS Act and Section 135(1)(a)(II) of Customs Act.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against the judgment of the Special Judge for G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Firearm Injury. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Postmortem Report Did Not Describe Any Firearm Injury and Recovery of Weapon Was Not Credible.

The appellant, Ramesh Babulal Soni @ Chamat, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...