High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NCB Petition Challenging Special Court's Order Granting Interim Custody of Vehicle in NDPS Case — Special Court Under NDPS Act Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Application Under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. for Interim Custody of Seized Vehicle. The court held that the NDPS Act does not exclude the application of Cr.P.C. provisions for interim custody, and the Special Court, being a Court of Session, has the power to pass such orders.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Bangalore Zonal Unit, challenged an order dated 01.06.2022 passed by the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NDPS Cases, Bengaluru, in Spl.C.C.No.896/2022 (NCB F.No.48/1/22/2021/BZU). The impugned order granted interim custody of a Maruti Swift car bearing registration No.AP-37-DS-2191 to the respondent, Sala Sai Yashwanth Reddy, under Sections 451 read with 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The petitioner contended that the Special Judge erred in assuming jurisdiction to entertain the application for interim custody of the vehicle, arguing that the Special Court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) does not have the power to pass orders under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. The respondent, who claimed to be the owner of the vehicle, sought its release. The High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Mohammad Nawaz, examined the contention. The court noted that the Special Court is constituted under the NDPS Act and is deemed to be a Court of Session under Section 36C of the NDPS Act. Section 36D of the NDPS Act provides that the Code of Criminal Procedure shall apply to proceedings before a Special Court. The court held that Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. are procedural provisions that empower any criminal court to pass orders regarding the custody and disposal of property pending trial. The NDPS Act does not contain any provision excluding the application of these sections. Therefore, the Special Court has the jurisdiction to entertain an application for interim custody of a vehicle seized in connection with an NDPS offence. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the order of the Special Judge. The decision clarifies that Special Courts under the NDPS Act retain the power to grant interim custody of vehicles under the Cr.P.C., ensuring that property rights are not unnecessarily affected during the pendency of trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Interim Custody of Vehicle - Jurisdiction of Special Court under NDPS Act - Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C., 1973 - The issue was whether the Special Court under NDPS Act can entertain an application for interim custody of a vehicle seized in an NDPS case. The court held that the Special Court is a criminal court and Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. are procedural provisions applicable to all criminal courts. The NDPS Act does not contain any provision excluding the application of these sections. Therefore, the Special Court has jurisdiction to grant interim custody of the vehicle. (Paras 2-4)

B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Jurisdiction of Special Court - Sections 36A, 36C, 36D - The NDPS Act establishes Special Courts with jurisdiction to try offences under the Act. Section 36C provides that a Special Court shall be deemed to be a Court of Session. Section 36D provides that the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to proceedings before a Special Court. The court held that the Special Court has all the powers of a Court of Session, including the power to pass orders under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. for interim custody of property. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Special Court constituted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) has the jurisdiction to entertain an application for interim custody of a vehicle seized in connection with an offence under the NDPS Act, under Sections 451 and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the order of the Special Judge granting interim custody of the vehicle to the respondent. The court held that the Special Court under the NDPS Act has jurisdiction to entertain applications under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. for interim custody of vehicles seized in connection with NDPS offences.

Law Points

  • Special Court under NDPS Act has jurisdiction to entertain application for interim custody of vehicle under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C.
  • NDPS Act does not exclude application of Cr.P.C. provisions for interim custody
  • Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. are procedural and applicable to all criminal courts including Special Courts under NDPS Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (02) 1

CRL.P No. 8425 of 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))

2025-02-14

Mohammad Nawaz

NC: 2025:KHC:6793

Ms. Maheshwari D.M., Advocate for Sri. Madhukar M Deshpande, Advocate (for petitioner); Ms. Swathi R Bhat, Advocate for Sri. R. Prasanna Rao, Advocate (for respondent)

Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Bangalore Zonal Unit

Sala Sai Yashwanth Reddy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an order granting interim custody of a vehicle in an NDPS case.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (NCB) sought to set aside the order dated 01.06.2022 passed by the Special Judge granting interim custody of the vehicle to the respondent, and to dismiss the respondent's application for release of the vehicle.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the Special Judge lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application for interim custody of the vehicle under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. in a case arising under the NDPS Act.

Previous Decisions

The Special Judge (XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NDPS Cases, Bengaluru) passed an order on 01.06.2022 in Spl.C.C.No.896/2022 granting interim custody of the Maruti Swift car bearing registration No.AP-37-DS-2191 to the respondent under Sections 451 read with 457 Cr.P.C.

Issues

Whether the Special Court under the NDPS Act has jurisdiction to entertain an application for interim custody of a vehicle under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C.?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner (NCB) argued that the Special Judge erred in assuming jurisdiction to pass orders under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. as the NDPS Act does not confer such power on the Special Court. Respondent argued that the Special Court, being a Court of Session, has all the powers under Cr.P.C., including the power to grant interim custody of property.

Ratio Decidendi

The Special Court constituted under the NDPS Act is a criminal court and is deemed to be a Court of Session under Section 36C of the NDPS Act. Section 36D of the NDPS Act provides that the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to proceedings before a Special Court. Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. are procedural provisions that empower any criminal court to pass orders regarding the custody and disposal of property pending trial. The NDPS Act does not contain any provision excluding the application of these sections. Therefore, the Special Court has jurisdiction to grant interim custody of a vehicle seized in connection with an NDPS offence.

Judgment Excerpts

The order passed by the learned Special Judge granting interim custody of the vehicle/Maruthi Swift car bearing registration No.AP 37 DS 2191 to the respondent is challenged in this petition by the petitioner/complainant namely Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Bangalore Zonal Unit. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is two fold. Firstly, it is contended that the learned Special Judge except stating that the Special Court is conferred with the power/jurisdiction to consider the application for the interim custody of conveyance/vehicle under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. in cases arising out of NDPS Act, has not considered the matter on merits.

Procedural History

The respondent filed an application under Sections 451 read with 457 Cr.P.C. before the Special Judge for NDPS Cases, Bengaluru, seeking interim custody of the vehicle. The Special Judge allowed the application on 01.06.2022. The petitioner (NCB) challenged this order by filing a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka. The High Court heard the matter and dismissed the petition on 14.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 451, 457
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act): 36A, 36C, 36D
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NCB Petition Challenging Special Court's Order Granting Interim Custody of Vehicle in NDPS Case — Special Court Under NDPS Act Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Application Under Sections 451 and 457 Cr.P.C. for Interi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Obstruction and Assault Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction Under Section 186 IPC Without Charge and Sanction Under Section 195 CrPC Set Aside; Assault Charges Fail Due to Discrep...