Search Results for "Medical reimbursement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Medical reimbursement"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order Rejecting Compassionate Appointment Due to Low Points Under BSNL Scheme. Compassionate Appointment is a Concession, Not a Right, and Must Be Granted Only When Family is in Dire Financial Distress.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M. Kranthi, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Chennai Bench, dated 03.04.2023 ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof and Incorrect Multiplier Application. Claimant's Cross-Objection Dismissed as Tribunal's Award Was Not Inadequate Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

20 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident on 16.08.1992 when the original claimant, Kaushikbhai Dhansukhlal Shah, was riding his scooter on Makarpura Road...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs. 18,91,600 with 7.5% Interest Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Motorcyclist.

5 Jul 2023

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and son of Kashinath Zanje, who died in a road accident on 21 February 2015. The deceas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Medical Expenses Awarded Despite Claimant's Death During Pendency. The court held that the claimant was entitled to additional compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- under the head of medical expenses, which was not considered by the Tribunal.

28 Nov 2019

The appeal was filed by the claimant in MVC No.1735/2011 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hassan, seeking enhancement of compensation for in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Jun 2017

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Grievously Injured Engineering Student in Motor Accident Claim. Permanent Disability Assessed at 100% Due to Severe Head and Limb Injuries, Award Increased from Rs. 19,20,000 to Rs. 25,00,000 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 19th April 2011 passed by the Motor Accident Clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Depreciation Rates but Upholds Revenue's Disallowances on Travel Expenses, Medical Reimbursement, Motor Car Perquisite, and Rent as Capital Expenditure. The Court held that depreciation under Section 32 must be allowed at rates as amended from 2.4.1983, while affirming that employee travel expenses after destination are disallowable under Section 39 read with Rule 60, medical reimbursement is part of salary under Section 40(c), actual expenditure on motor cars for directors is to be considered, and rent of Rs.16,91,250/- is capital expenditure.

18 Sep 2012

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5873/Bom/8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

21 Feb 2011

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Centralised Admissions for Unaided Private Medical Colleges — No Legal Right to Compel CET/CAP. Parents' Association's challenge fails as the court finds no statutory or constitutional mandate requiring unaided private colleges to participate in a common entrance test or centralised admission process.

5 May 2005

The Petitioner, a society of parents of medical students registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition seeking a mandam...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)