Search Results for "Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906"

Trending :

Search Results for "Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Lease Created After Tillers' Day Not Subject to Purchase Obligation Under Sections 32-O and 32-P of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Claim for Restoration After 32 Years Held Time-Barred and Without Termination of Tenancy.

9 Feb 2024

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original tenant, challenged the orders of the Tahsildar and the appellate authority directing eviction and restora...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Tenancy Rights Over Land in Absence of Mutation Entry and Adverse Possession. The court held that the burden to prove tenancy lies on the claimant and that the claim was barred by limitation as the petitioners had not been in possession for over 12 years.

16 Jun 2022

The petitioners, Shamrao Rambhau Konde and Gulabrao Rambhau Konde, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

26 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Maharashtra Land Ceiling Case — Partition Deed Prior to Cut-off Date Not Ignored Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Registered Partition Deed Dated 31.01.1970 Held Valid as It Was Executed Before 26.09.1970, Not Deemed to Avoid Ceiling Laws.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a difference of opinion between two judges of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of a partition deed dated 31.01.1970 exec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Right of Way Dispute Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld. Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction Not Barred by Section 21(2) of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 as the Provision Only Bars Suits for Removal of Obstruction.

23 Mar 2017

The case arises from a dispute over a right of way in village Kawadshi. The applicants (original defendants 5 to 9) challenged an order of the trial c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award — Delay in Filing Application Not Barred Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Limitation Under Section 7(7) Applies Only to Appeals, Not to Original Applications for Gratuity.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Cooperative Tribal Development Corporation Ltd. and its officers, challenged the order of the Controlling Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Right of Way Under Section 143 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Sub-Divisional Officer's Remand Order Quashed as Naib Tahsildar Had Conducted Proper Enquiry.

30 Aug 2006

The petitioners, Smt. Vidya Karandikar and Vijay Karandikar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nagpur, dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Act of State Doctrine in Resumption of Property in Junagadh; Resumption by Administrator Before Annexation Held Not Justiciable. Administrator's Order Resuming Immovable Property While Junagadh People Were Aliens Outside the State Deemed Act of State Under Indian Independence Act, 1947, Section 7.

4 Aug 1959

The case arose from a suit filed by the respondent, Memon Haji Ismail Haji, against the State of Junagadh (later substituted by State of Saurashtra) s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)