WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011
26 May 2025...
Search Results for "Malad"
359 result(s) found
Found 359 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Certificate Under MOFA Section 11 — Competent Authority Cannot Incorporate Third-Party Rights Created by Documents Other Than Section 4 Agreement. Court Directs Removal of Such References from Certificate While Relegating Parties to Civil Suit.
8 Mar 2024The Petitioner, Riddhi Gardens Building No. A1, A2 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance issu...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries and Revenue Records in Land Dispute — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Follow Natural Justice Before Making Entries Affecting Rights.
21 Mar 2022The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals challenging mutation entries made in revenue records in respect of certain lands. The pe...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Society's Appeal Against Injunction in Redevelopment Dispute — Single Member Cannot Stall Majority Decision. Section 104 CPC read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC — Trial court's interim injunction restraining society from redevelopment set aside as it was based on disputed facts and balance of convenience favored the society.
7 May 2021The appellant, Abhanga Samata Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, is the o...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Court holds that prior permission of the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is mandatory before demolition of a cessed building.
6 Sep 2019The petitioners, tenants of a cessed building known as 'Shreeji Krupa' in Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of the building by ...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.
19 Aug 2019The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy. The court ruled that revenue authorities cannot decide title disputes and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for such matters.
23 Jul 2019The petitioners, Mr. Ashok Bansidhar Agarwal and M/s. Rajeshwar Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
7 Feb 2017The appellant, Sallauddin @Bablu Nizamuddin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for the murder of Javed and for robbery un...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Inclusion in Slum Rehabilitation List Due to Lack of Electoral Roll Evidence. Petitioner failed to prove residence as of 1.1.1995, a requirement under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.
19 Mar 2013The petitioner, Indu Ramchandra Khanvilkar, claimed to have a hut on survey no.162/162-2/1 to 7, 165/1 to 84 at Village Malad, Taluka Borivli, which w...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Suit for Injunction Relating to Open Land — Small Causes Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. The suit for injunction regarding open land used for water tap and underground cable was held to be exclusively triable by the Small Causes Court under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, as the land was appurtenant to a building.
31 Jan 2005The appellant, Rambaran Mayashankar Tiwari, carrying on business as Bhole Shankar Flour Mill, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a...
- 74
