Search Results for "Major penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Major penalty"

908 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order and Remands for Fresh Inquiry in Sexual Harassment Dispute. The court held that imposing major penalty under Section 13(3)(i) of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 requires separate inquiry under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, as applicable to IIT Bombay employees, beyond Internal Complaints Committee proceedings.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Bombay adjudicated a writ petition filed by a professor at IIT Bombay challenging his compulsory retirement order based on sexual ha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Substitution of Penalty in CRPF Disciplinary Case Due to Abuse of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Non-Compliance. Judicial Review Under Article 226 Must Respect Statutory Mandate Under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, with Punishment Commensurate to Misconduct Involving Violence and False Allegations.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) who was charged with misconduct under R...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Second Show Cause Notice Proposing Dismissal from Service Based on Internal Complaints Committee Report in a Sexual Harassment Case. The Court Frames the Issue Whether the Proposed Penalty Can Be Imposed Without Following Service Rules Disciplinary Procedure, in Light of Supreme Court Precedents.

20 Jul 2021

The petitioner, a professor at Mangalore University and former Chairman of the Department of Economics, challenged a second show cause notice dated 05...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Interpretation of Increment Withholding Order as Major Penalty. Withholding of increment without cumulative effect is a minor penalty, not a major penalty.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Dr. Nilkanth Dhyanoba Jogdande and Dr. Eknath Rambhau Patil, retired employees of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

27 Mar 2018

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

16 Feb 2017

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

20 Feb 2015

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

20 Mar 2014

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty in Railway Disciplinary Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Supply Documents and Inadequate Inquiry. Central Administrative Tribunal's order set aside as disciplinary authority imposed penalty without providing relevant documents to the employee, violating principles of natural justice under Railway Service Conduct Rules, 1966.

8 May 2013

The petitioner, R.C. Dahore, was a Divisional Electrical Engineer with Western Railway. He was appointed as an Apprentice Mechanic (Electrical) and la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Against Penalty Liability in Workmen's Compensation Case. Insurance Company Not Liable for Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 as Penalty is Personal Liability of Employer.

5 Jan 2010

The case involves an appeal by the New India Assurance Company Ltd. against an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation & Judge, Labour Co...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)