Search Results for "Maharashtra Land Requisition Act"

374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for Elevated Service Reservoir declared lapsed as Planning Authority failed to acquire or take proceedings within statutory period under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Jawahar Hiralal Mehta, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Acquisition or Restoration of Land in Land Acquisition Act Case — Possession Already Taken Under Award. Writ of Mandamus Cannot Compel Acquisition When Land Vests in State Under Section 16 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to acquire t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Land Reservation for Architects' Association. State's Power to Modify Development Plan Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Upheld.

The petitioner, Indian Institute of Architects, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...