Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Factory in Lump-Sum Contribution Dispute. Agreement for lump-sum contribution in lieu of taxes under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Rules, 1961 held binding on village panchayat, barring unilateral revision of tax.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a public limited company located within the territorial jurisdiction of Village Panchayat Jogeshwari, challenged a ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Reservation of Open Space for Staff Housing. Petitioner's claim for allotment of reserved open space fails as no legal right established and policy decisions of MIDC upheld.

The petitioner, a society of industrial members in MIDC Jalgaon area, filed a writ petition challenging communications dated July 3, 2002 and July 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MIDC Revision Against Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act. Suit for Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Even Against Statutory Corporation Acting Under Court Orders.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order of the City Civil Court Judge, Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Labour Court Jurisdiction in Salary Recovery Dispute. Non-scheduled air transport service not covered by Central Government's definition under Section 2(a)(i) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence State Labour Court has jurisdiction.

The petitioner, MESCO Airlines Limited, an air transport company holding a license for non-scheduled air transport service under the Aircraft Rules, 1...