Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1982"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Civil Services Rules 1982"

560 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 560 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging MAT Order Granting Pensionary Benefits to SRPF Constable. Respondent entitled to pension after completing 20 years of qualifying service under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as per Rule 49(1) read with Rule 50.

26 Oct 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and others under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Pensionary Benefits of Private Secretaries to Judges. Court holds that service as Private Secretary to a Judge is pensionable under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and that the petitioners are entitled to pension and other retirement benefits.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Private Secretaries to Judges of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pensionary benef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Granting Second ACPS Benefit to Retired Employee. The Court upheld that the second benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme is to be granted from the date of completion of 24 years of service, not from the date of first benefit, and that the benefit of higher pay scale at absorption does not disentitle the employee from future ACPS benefits.

22 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge by the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 18/02/2021, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

10 Dec 2013

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Pensionary Benefits to Shikshan Sevaks under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Schools (Conduct of Service) Rules, 2014. Held that service as Shikshan Sevak counts towards qualifying service for pension.

19 Aug 2022

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Shikshan Sevaks (teachers) employed in Zilla Parishad schools in Maharashtra. The petitioners, Vij...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension of Part-Time Teacher - Service as Part-Time Teacher Must Be Counted for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's entire service for pension benefits.

4 May 2017

The petitioner, Sou. Mone Rashmi Shriram, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29/6/2016 issued by the Office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

14 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Termination and Pension Denial; Teacher Claims Protection Under Rule 47 and Exceptions for Absenteeism Period. Petitioner Contends Delay and Misapplication of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

19 Jan 2012

The writ petition arose from a long-standing dispute involving a school teacher's termination and pension claim. The petitioner was appointed as an As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Part-Time Teacher's Pension Claim in Night Junior College Case. Teacher's 29 years of part-time service in a night junior college does not qualify as full-time service under MEPS Rules for pension eligibility.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Mrs. Rajani Rajan Dixit, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Denial of Legal Heirship Certificate to Second Wife in Pension Dispute Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Court Interprets Rule 116(6)(a)(i) in Consonance with Hindu Personal Law, Refusing to Recognize Void Marriage for Pension Purposes.

10 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from an application for a legal heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 filed by the first wife and her childr...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)