Search Results for "Madras Urban Development Project"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Allotment of Excess Land Under As Is Where Is Scheme. Encroachers Cannot Claim Land Beyond What Was Allotted Based on Enumeration, as the Scheme Only Protects Livelihood of Landless Poor.

The dispute involved eight writ petitions filed by encroachers on government land classified as ‘Eri Poramboke’ in Chennai. The Government of Tami...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Land Acquisition for Road Widening; Upholds Validity Under Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 Without Separate Notification

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land and buildings belonging to the appellants by the Tamil Nadu Highways Department for a road expansion pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.

The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case. Assessee Held Eligible for Exemption Under Section 10(20A) as Development Authority and Business Commenced in Relevant Year.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Board's Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute — Directs Payment of Allotment Rate Instead of Development Cost. The court held that the Board's policy of charging allotment rate for industrial plots is valid and the writ court erred in directing payment of development cost.

The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (Board) appealed against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.24701-702/2012, which directed...