Search Results for "Legal Fiction"

648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order in Lokayukta Trap Case — Petitioner Deemed Suspended Under Rule 10(2)(b) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 for Custody Over 48 Hours, But Suspension Revoked After Release on Bail.

The petitioner, Sri. Basavaraj S/o. Pundalikappa Nirugi, aged about 59 years, was working as a Revenue Officer in the City Municipal Council, Bagalkot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Conversion Rejection in KLR Act Case — Deputy Commissioner Directed to Reconsider Application Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Endorsement Without Reasons Quashed as Not a Speaking Order.

The petitioner, Sri Suhail Rehaman, claimed to be the absolute owner of agricultural land bearing Sy.No.177/5 (old No.177) measuring 0-35 ½ guntas si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal: Rectification Under Section 35 of Income-tax Act Valid for Mistake Arising from Retrospective Amendment. Retrospective Operation of Proviso to Section 18-A(5) Renders Original Assessment Order Erroneous on Face of Record.

The dispute arose from the retrospective amendment of Section 18-A(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 195...