Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Labour Welfare Officer"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Wage Hike for Mathadi Workers. The court held that the Mathadi Board's wage increase was not arbitrary and the Board had not failed in its duty to ensure full utilization of workers under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.

1 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Ltd., a government company, challenged an order dated 12/08/2011 passed by the Nagpur and Wardha District Mat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

19 Sep 2006

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to Regularization of Daily Wage Safai Kamgars. Industrial Court's Order to Confer Permanent Status Upheld as Employees Worked Continuously and Were Denied Benefits Unfairly.

20 Feb 2024

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by the Alibag Municipal Council and its Chief Officer challenging orders of the Industrial Court date...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Government's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency Benefits to Horticultural Workers under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that employees engaged in preparing fruit plants, tree plants, vegetable plants, and plantation activity for over 240 days are entitled to permanency benefits.

4 Nov 2023

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the State Government of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Counting Casual Labour Service as Qualifying Service for Pension in Kerala Fisheries Department Case. The Court held that pension is a social welfare measure and that the appellant's casual labour service should be counted for pension under Government Orders and Pension Rules.

26 Aug 2020

The appellant, V. Sukumaran, worked as a Casual Labour Roll (CLR) worker in the Fisheries Department of Kerala from 7 July 1976 to 29 November 1983, r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Oct 2016

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Retrenchment Case — Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Automatically Entitle Workman to Reinstatement; Compensation of Rs. 50,000 Awarded Instead. The court held that relief for illegal retrenchment is discretionary and depends on facts such as nature of employment and length of service.

29 Jun 2021

The appellant, Hemant Babruvahan Parchake, was appointed as a Senior Caretaker on a daily wage basis by the respondent Social Welfare Officer and Dist...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Principal Employer Under Employees Compensation Act, Upholding Joint and Several Liability for Death of Contract Worker. Court Applies Section 12 of Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to Hold Principal Employer KPTCL Liable Along with Contractor, Emphasizing Statutory Protection to Workmen.

30 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from the death of Udachappa, a coolie engaged by Larsen and Toubro Limited (respondent No.3), who was electrocuted on 05.05.2004 whi...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Petition in Industrial Dispute Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Employee. Labour Court's award under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 modified as compensation was inadequate for terminated employees of merged municipality.

9 Jan 2026

The petitioners, three employees of Vejalpur Nagarpalika, were appointed as Rojamdar Employees in 2003 and later worked as Assistant Clerks from 2009....

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)