Search Results for "Karnataka Slum Act"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Against Preventive Detention Order under Karnataka Goonda Act. Detenu Alleges Non-Consideration of Representation and Arbitrary Use of Power by Police Inspector.

The writ petition is a habeas corpus proceeding filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the detenu and his wife against the Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom.

The appellant, Lalit Vilasrao Thakare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (V), Nagpur in Sessions Case No.78 of 2013 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Grounds Were Not Communicated in Tulu, a Language Known to Detenu.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Article 22(5). The court held that failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu renders the detention illegal.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of the detenu Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Transfer of Designated Officers Under Food Safety Act — Administrative Transfer Not a Punishment Without Stigma. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Administrative Convenience Does Not Require Prior Hearing Under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, eleven Designated Officers under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, challenged their transfer orders dated 15.12.2014 before th...